Course 11
07 March 08 - 20 June 08
Self-Organizing [SO] City
room for informality and formality
Programme
Day 1Friday 7 March 2008Venue: Casla AlmereThe Self-Organizing City [organizing the SO city]Who organizes the 21st century city? The peer oriented professional, market parties, large institutions or the people? Which set of relations is necessary for a balanced collaboration? According to Juval Portugali, dealing with complex, fragmental and multidimensional urban conditions requires understanding the city as a collection of interacting self-organizing systems. Self organizing systems do not only refer to bottom up or informal processes. In contrast, self-organizing systems exist and evolve through the interplay between bottom up and top down, informal and formal, planned and emerged conditions.Moderator: ir. Ekim Tan |
MorningProf. Han Meyer(TU-Delft) A Long Tradition of Urbanism and Private InitiativesProf. Juval Portugali(Tel Aviv University) Theories of Self-Organization and the CityIr. Claudio Acioly(IHS Rotterdam) Gaps and bridges between formal and informal urbanizationAfternoonJacqueline Tellinga(City of Almere) A city built by and for peopleIr. Floris Alkemade(OMA) Homeruskwartier: An experiment of a self-organizing neighborhood in AlmereIr. Robert Broesi(MUST Stedebouw) Smart Urban design in Almere-Hout |
Day 2Friday 11 April 2008Venue: to be confirmedInformality in the Formality, Formality in the Informality [economy of the SO city]‘Informality has long existed. Today, after acentury of efforts by the regulatory state, we seean expanding informality in the global Northas a systemic feature of advanced capitalism,rather than an importation of the Third World.’ (2006; Saskia Sassen)The entirely top-down planned city of Almere attempts for a less formalized organization by the end-users. Whereas the city of Istanbul needs to find new ways of organizing informally and locally organized urban land under the pressure of global forces. Anatolian immigrants mostly occupy the informal settlements in Istanbul. Parallel to Istanbul, the city of Rotterdam looks for new ways of organizing its urban conditions by giving more room to its immigrants under which there are Anatolian immigrants form a large group. Both Rotterdam and Groningen try to create more conditions for new, unexpected and unplanned economic activities. Moderator: Prof. dr. Han Meyer |
MorningDr. David Hamers(Ruimtelijk PlanBureau) A New City as Condition for the Creative IndustryDr. Murat Yalcintan(Istanbul Mimar Sinan University) Re-positioning Informality in a Rapidly Formalizing EconomyAfternoonIr. Karin Schrederhof(City of Rotterdam) Pact op Zuid; The Role of local/service economy for South RotterdamIr. Tjerk Ruimschotel(City of Groningen) Conditions for a non-planned economy |
Day 3Friday 16 May 2008Venue: Strand IJburg ‘Blijburg’"Responsive Design [forming the SO City]"‘To argue that a space must be porous means to look for the proportions of voids within a mass, for available space in which to absorb movement and change.’ (2005, Paola Vigano) What are the new ways of activating and forming the hidden energies in the city? Can using informality, -or creating porousness in the city become a useful strategy for the designer? Innovation in design is needed in interacting with people and releasing the complexity of the current society. What is responsive design in the 21st century? Can adaptations of the physical environments through people become part of a design system? Moderator: ir. Ekim Tan |
MorningProf. Paola Vigano(IUAV Venice) The Porous City - a new Structure Plan for AntwerpFlavio Janches(Blinder Janches & Co Architects) Designing Urban Opportunities: strategies on slums integration, Buenos Aires - ArgentinaAfternoonAlex Lehnerer(ETH Zurich, Kaisersrot) Generative Design Models and the Interactive City; the case of Madestein(Den Haag), Schuytgraaf(Arnhem)Ir. Pi de Bruin(Architecten Cie) Designing the Participatory City in Roombeek, Enschede |
Day 4Friday 30 mei 2008Venue: Heerlijkheid Hoogvliet, RotterdamTowards an Inclusive City [public space in the SO city]How to read new publicness and facilitate or design public places in the 21st century’s self-organizing complexity? What role can public environments play towards a more inclusive city? Terms to describe the ‘bourgeois’ public spaces of the 18th century Paris or 19th century Vienna are still in use but offer little help in describing our modern reality. We need to find new ways of looking at ‘processes of exchange’ and ‘mutual interest’, and new means to facilitate them. According to Arnold Reijndorp, opting for themed, compressed, and connected public spaces is a valid approach. Alternatively, polycentricity, interstitiality and participation may play a major role as in the works of Liane Lefevre and Döll Architects. Moderator: Dr. Diego Sepúlveda |
MorningProf. Arnold Reijndorp(University of Amsterdam) The New Public DomainIr. Jorge Jauregi(former director project Favela Barrio) The Inclusion at the Renewal processes on upgrading slumsAfternoonCrimson Arch. Historians (Rotterdam)WIMBY! Heerlijkheid HoogvlietHenk Döll enLiane Lefaivre (Buenos Aires + Rotterdam) The City as a PlaygroundIr. Dennis Kaspori enJeanne van Heeswijk Bottom up projects and the city |
Day 5Friday 20 juni 2008Venue: TU-DelftComments by participantsConclusions of the Course and presentations on topics discussed in this course, given by students and professionals. |
^

